Remote or Return-to-Office – The Hybrid Work Dilemma in Sri Lankan Corporates
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has moved the world working trend radically, and hybrid work is the new normal. Nevertheless, Sri Lankan corporates are still stuck in the dilemma of adhering to organizational culture and flexibility of employees versus productivity. According to a survey of Postgraduate Institute of Management (PIM) conducted in 2024, the share of local companies that formally had a hybrid work policy was only 38 percent, even though on the global scale, the trends were oriented towards flexible arrangements (PIM, 2024). This gap highlights the necessity of strategic HR leadership in the creation of the hybrid models that will fit the workplace culture specific to Sri Lanka.
Discussion
The success of hybrid work relies on three pillars, which are: technology, culture and performance measurement. Lack of proper digital infrastructure and access disparity to devices in Sri Lanka have slowed down the process of remote collaboration (Wijesinghe and Senanayake, 2023). Virtual performance tracking tools are not available in many companies, and this leads to mistrust to remote employees by managers. This has seen some employers revert to strict office attendance, which has destroyed the satisfaction of employees.
Besides, cultural attitudes are critical. Face-to-face supervision is commonly associated with productivity in Sri Lankan work places, which is more of a classic approach in leadership (Jayawardena, 2022). The HR departments need to train managers to judge employees on the basis of results and not on the basis of their presence. It has been found that in case HR departments use trust-oriented leadership frameworks, hybrid workers become more engaged and less likely to exit the company (Dessler, 2023).
The other challenge is policy inconsistency. A lot of companies are in an in-between state of full-remote and mandatory office policies, which is confusing and stressful. A successful HRM involves clear regulations that do not places too much control on the organization but rather on the individual. Sustainability in hybrid models can be guaranteed by promoting employee feedback and routinely conducted engagement surveys and mental health support (Wijesinghe and Senanayake, 2023).
Conclusion
The hybrid work dilemma of the Sri Lankan corporates is an indication of the midst of HRM evolution. In order to succeed, HR leaders have to shift away the control of attendance to the control of performance based on trust. Investing in technology, evolving digital competencies, and inclusive cultures will help organizations to view hybrid work as an innovation driver and a contributor to the well-being of employees instead of a trade-off.
References
Dessler, G. (2023) Human Resource Management. 17th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Jayawardena, S. (2022) ‘Leadership and Cultural Barriers to Hybrid Work in Sri Lanka,’ Asian Management Review, 15(3), pp. 74–86.
PIM (2024) Sri Lanka Hybrid Work and Digital Readiness Report. Colombo: Postgraduate Institute of Management.
Wijesinghe, D. and Senanayake, P. (2023) ‘Digital Infrastructure and Remote Work Productivity: A Study of Sri Lankan Corporates,’ International Journal of Business and Technology, 11(2), pp. 121–136.
STUDENT ID- EUK00310229










